![]() ![]() ![]() But then if you have a multi-lingual team or if you are multi-lingual yourself, then you might want to try: ![]() Some tools like Otter go really deep into English and the customization of the vocabulary. So you can count on the quality of the summary. Wudpecker leverages directly the well-known GPT model. To really assess the quality, you would have to try for yourself. But if you want to get the reaction of participants, then go for:Īll of these tools have developed their model for summary. Some tools only focus on audio recording, like Otter or Jaime. If you want to have not just the meeting summary, but a tool where you can also plan your agenda, then only Wudpecker currently has the functionality. Do I want to run meetings with clear agenda?.When deciding which one to go for, it's important to check a few things: Still struggling to decide the best tool for you? Avoma has a few plans starting from free to $79/user/month.Focus lies on transcription and analysis of conversations rather than providing AI driven meeting notes and summaries of what has been mentioned.Integration into CRMs for sales professionals to share information.Ability to track keywords across different calls.Live bookmarking during your calls, so you can remember what was important.Automatic video and audio recording and transcription.Scheduling, Agenda Templates and collaboration.Avoma offers AI meeting notes as part of a more comprehensive sales intelligence tool. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |